It is heartbreaking’: the way 30 captive beluga whales are being used as tools in row over inhumane treatment.
Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but guardian-like friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a gentle spirit.
A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been entangled in a struggle between a shuttered park, government authorities and advocacy groups.
But those closest to the whales say the heated debate over their destiny often ignores the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been closely studied by the people who interact with them daily.
After the Canadian government blocked the export of the belugas to China, the struggling facility near the famous falls where they are housed warned to euthanize them unless the government pays for the expense of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that request, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.
Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures
Scientists say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and communal behavior indicate they are highly cognitive animals – something one caretaker learned directly.
Burgess spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a role that entailed gaining confidence of the aquatic animals.
“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so magical and gratifying.”
The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nonetheless amazed by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She developed a special affection for a pair of whales with different temperaments.
“One whale chose me. The other required effort,” she said. “Each changed the way I view bonding.”
Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions
Burgess’s connection with the whales progressed against a background of rising activist criticism to their captivity.
During her tenure at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a toll which the park ascribes to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say points to the poor conditions in which they were maintained.
The facility did not operate to the public over the recent season, but Burgess says she observed directly consequences of the closure. “Concrete is deteriorating from the pools because they’re falling apart and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and swim around with fragments in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”
The facility did not comment to a inquiry, but earlier asserted: “The whales … receive far better health care and constant care than any individual in the UK, or other places.”
Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions
Burgess was terminated from the park in the spring following the death of Eos, an sick beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the park suspected particulars of the incident were disclosed to the press and she was released not long after.
The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and other caretakers in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any efforts to put down even a single beluga would require “considerable staff”, vehicles and specialized tools.
“It cannot happen in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess supports demands for the whales to be removed right away from the park, with its deteriorating pools and shrinking team.
In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a bid to transfer the whales to an overseas location.
“Allowing the proposal would have meant a continued life in captivity and a return to public entertainment,” the minister stated. “As Canadians, we know that belugas are meant for the ocean, not in pools for our entertainment. I could not in ethical standing authorize an relocation that would perpetuate the treatment these belugas have suffered.”
But Burgess said the official’s remarks indicate a wider misunderstanding of the realities of life for belugas born in captivity.
“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have lived entirely in enclosed habitats and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t comprehend that it’s not as easy as saying ‘shut it down’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion
As authorities work to find a resolution, suggestions have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Inuit communities.
A suggested sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which has received regulatory clearance, has shown to be most controversial. The future site, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, is not yet built. Proponents remain optimistic that it could eventually represent a long term resolution for a number of the whales.
But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “simply an experiment” in the whales’ fate.
Others say the idea of a protected habitat indicates a worldwide trend away from captive facilities and could represent a workable approach in the coming months.
An official, leader of the sanctuary project, said the facility will replicate the mental engagement and diet the whales get from specialists, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|