🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.