🔗 Share this article

Ex-President Donald Trump has consistently shown his desire to see opponents investigated, exerting pressure on the DOJ to charge former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We cannot postpone further, it's damaging our standing and credibility," the leader stated last month in a social media message.

"I was impeached twice, and charged me (five times!)" he said, mentioning the four criminal cases he encountered after leaving the White House in 2021 and James's lawsuit.

Both have since been charged, in situations that numerous specialists have said appear to be driven by politics and difficult to win in court.

But the latest allegations against a presidential opponent, ex national security adviser John Bolton, differ significantly, legal experts and former prosecutors assert.

"In my opinion, contrasting Bolton's charges to Comey's is like comparing apples to oranges," stated Mark Lesko, a ex federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

This Specifics of Bolton's Case

Bolton has been formally charged on national allegations related to the supposed improper handling of classified information. After leaving the White House in 2019, he has emerged as a outspoken Trump critic, going so far as to describe him "stunningly uninformed" and unfit for office in his memoir.

Experts say that while there may be political motivations to target Bolton, the procedures used to secure an charge and the evidence gathered against him indicate a possibly more substantial legal argument than the DOJ brought against James.

"This misconduct that's being alleged is simultaneously more serious and seems to have taken place over a considerable duration," said Carissa Byrne Hessick, a professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his time as Trump's security advisor, and after his 2019 White House departure, authorities claimed that Bolton placed the country at risk by improperly keeping and transmitting classified information to relatives using insecure means, including AOL. Several of the materials were labeled highly classified.

The indictment alleges that at a certain time a unauthorized user accessed to Bolton's account where documents were stored and sent an apparent warning to cause "the largest controversy since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were released".

Bolton pleaded not guilty during a court appearance on Friday to eighteen distinct charges of mishandling sensitive materials.

Retribution or a Strong Legal Argument?

The timing of his indictment - coming on the tails of allegations against Comey - has renewed concerns about external influence on the legal system.

Trump previously implied Bolton belonged in jail, and called him a "disreputable person". Bolton, for his role, authored a book about his time in the Trump government that was highly critical of the leader.

"There's no question that the schedule of this indictment, when paired with additional cases, has raised doubts about the strength of these allegations, and the reason these counts are being brought at this time," said Jamil Jaffer, founder and director of the National Security Institute.

However, he continued, "should the DOJ is capable to prove the allegations alleged and show the information is correctly designated, his behavior may certainly have broken the law".

Charging such a high-ranking official for mishandling classified documents is "uncommon" but not unprecedented, noted Carrie Cordero, a expert at the Center for a New American Security.

"Cases that concern classified information present challenges to try, but they may and are brought against both low-level and senior personnel, from occasionally," she said.

Similarities to Investigations into Former President and Biden

Trump likewise encountered charges of wrongfully keeping classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida and obstructing their recovery, but that case was eventually dismissed by a federal judge and negated by his return as president.

A independent investigator additionally found that ex-President Joe Biden improperly stored classified documents from his period as second-in-command, but did not criminally charge him.

Bolton's case shares characteristics to Biden's sensitive materials matters, noted Mr Lesko, who also held a top national security role at the Justice Department.

Strict procedures govern the handling of sensitive materials. To secure a guilty verdict, the government must prove that Bolton was aware the information he was sending was classified, and he had to knowingly transmit it to someone without authorization to receive it.

"Due to the sensitive nature of the information at issue in this matter, we don't have a great deal of details about why the government contends elements like the diary entries and the other information he communicated by email, and the reason there were restricted," explained Mr Jaffer.

A More Traditional Prosecution

The process by which the DOJ brought this legal action will be under scrutiny, following Trump publicly posted his desire to see his political opponents charged and several of those charges came to fruition.

But Mr Lesko said in Bolton's situation, authorities appear to have adhered to protocol.

"This Bolton prosecution and ultimately the charge seemed to have observed the standard process including the regulations and norms within the Department of Justice," he stated.

Unlike Comey's short, two-page charge, Bolton's was a increasingly "conventional" document that "explicitly sets forth the details involving the facts and situation here," Mr Lesko commented.

"It seems reasonably aligned with a long line of precedents... where government officials mishandled and shared classified material."